According to this article from Reuters news
“Most Americans get their water from municipal or regional community water systems. A new CDC report showed that as of 2006, 69 percent of people in the United States who get water from these systems received fluoridated water, up from 65 percent in 2000 and 62 percent in 1992.”
I often have wondered about the health benefits of fluoridation especially since I have heard of numerous concerns regarding health risks and harmful additives associated with manufactured fluoride. Fluoride does occur naturally in groundwater. Fluoride that is added to tap water is mostly manufactured from Fluorosilicic acid. FSA is a waste product from the manufacture of phosphate fertilizer. There are other sources for fluoride manufacture too but not as widely used.
If Americans are truly benefiting from fluoridation as the governments claims, I would think that the rise in consumption of bottled water and other bottled beverages would reduce the amount of tap water consumed. How would anyone know for sure that you are benefiting from fluoridation just because you live where it is available? Research that is supposed to support drinking water fluoridation refers to lowered dental bills in fluoridated areas. Couldn't you be paying less dental bills because of better access to dental care, good oral hygiene or a healthier diet? I think it is possible for fluoride claims to easily be misrepresented if these factors are not considered.
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has a fact sheet is available on their website.
A web link is provided so you can check if your city’s water is fluoridated.
On the CDC site, there is a specific FAQ about the cost of fluoridating a water system. It states “The per person cost of fluoridation varies by the size of the community population. The average cost of providing fluoridated water to communities with more than 20,000 residents is about 50 cents per year” It doesn't’t really give you the whole picture of what it would cost your community. Portland Oregon is a city where fluoridation is still not in effect and the topic is hotly debated. According to KATU.com, David Shaff, the administrator of the Portland Water Bureau, said mandated fluoridation would cost the city up to $4 million upfront, and then $600,000 in annual operating costs. To me, numbers like 4 million put it in better perspective for me.
Fluoride is the only active ingredient in toothpaste. On toothpaste tubes there is a warning that if swallowed you should call a poison control center immediately. So what does drinking fluoride do? The CDC site talks of the benefits of fluoride but does not state any hard data. How do we really know if it works or not and has anyone specifically studied the concerns? The FDA or EPA do not control the fluoridation of drinking water. Those who condemn fluoridation claim that fluoride can have ill effects on the environment and people’s long term health. Flouridealert.org refers to a study in which the dental costs for HMO’s participants were tracked in Portland Metro area of Oregon. In this case, the dental care costs in the largest region surveyed were lower in the areas without water fluoridation. That data doesn't’ seem to support the claims of CDC. If fluoride has even a tiny risk, I can’t see the value in adding it to the water. Someone is profiting from selling the “valuable” waste products that become the fluoride additive. I am sure that helps to perpetuate the need for fluoridation. I was not surprised to also find that most other countries do not fluoridate. Alot of countries who did flouridate their drinking water have eliminated it or have reduced the fluoride due to health concerns. Here are some links below about fluoride in case you would like to read more for yourself.
CDC Fact Sheet http://www.cdc.gov/fluoridation/faqs.htm
www.fluoridedebate.com
www.fluoridealert.org
http://www.zerowasteamerica.org/Fluoride.htm
http://www.orgsites.com/ny/nyscof/




Recent Comments